That the RN had bought kits for. Secondly I didn’t say anything about putting SSTD expendable torpedo decoys and Scutter into the water near each other. The B1B remedies this with thicker Optimised Gun Barrels (OGB), their length has been increased from 1.520m to 1.981m and they are supported by the distinctive cage muzzle brace for further accuracy gains. If the T45 is going to be looked at as an anti-ballistic missile defence ship for not only protecting carrier groups but also land targets, this radar will be a must have! T45, LPH, QEC plus future fits to T26, poss T31? What about fitting a different CIWS or fitting other gun-based defences to complement CIWS? Ideally though I’d prefer a better baseline so that ships have multiple layers of defence. This means that if the CIWS… Read more ». This way if one or the other gets damaged by incoming shrapnel it can still be operational. You can see them pretty well in this slow-mo footage of the firing trials. General Dynamics Company - Ordnance and Tactical Systems Press Releases “I repeat, our vessels are not under-armed compared to their NATO peers.”. They could carry say 12 LRASMs, 24 TLAMs and 240 quad-packed CAMMs (and ideally CAMM-ER if they can be quad-packed). Even LRASM isn’t long ranged enough compared to long ranged Russian and Chinese anti-ship missiles and Perseus will only have a range of about 300km.

Featuring a 20mm barrel it is capable of firing 4,500 rounds per minute against anti-ship missiles and a range of surface threats.#Phalanx #CIWS #CapabilityIncreased pic.twitter.com/LbIEjHw6uL, — HMS Queen Elizabeth (@HMSQNLZ) February 6, 2019. Indeed. And there are other systems available not just Goalkeeper. Illustrious was rushed into service to provide reinforcements for the Falklands War. The Ship has proudly flown the flag for the UK across the Atlantic.”.

So to future fit ExLS to launch CAMM-ER on T45. Take a look at the anti-aircraft armament of WW2 carriers and battleships pre-war and compare that to their 1945 configurations. My thoughts are that we should design a 40mm cannon that could provide the extra range and punch, and also allow for an air burst round I believe? They’re Atlantic Conveyors waiting to happen. Paul T. Agree with Sea Ceptor (and ideally a 4th Phalanx, as it happens) since would be mounted off the flight deck, no doubt. But in its current form, Phalanx is far too short ranged and lacks enough ammo to be a credible CIWS. Lots of precious F-35’s would go up in smoke. Thanks so much for any info you can give me! Phalanx block 1b is very helpful in these envoiroments. Yes bad press from russian trolls ! It would also make sense for us to build more Astutes since they provide a very good layer of defence against enemy subs and ships (and fit them with Scutter).

But that is not the primary role of T45. Before even basic PFHE (1980s) the Twin Compact 40mm had a 30% chance to kill a subsonic missile outside of 1000 meters in the 1970s when first introduced and so used APFSDS…because of 3P effective range is 3km plus.

Helicopter Carriers (1-2), Amphibious Transport Docks (2), Dock Landing “I’d agree about the Aster 30NT, it makes sense and I believe that it is being progressed in fact.”, “All of our surface warships are equipped the Sea Sentor system already, which is similar in concept to SCUTTER”. And the sooner we get Meteor fitted to the F-35Bs the better. The carriers and amphibious vessels all use RAM out of the 21-cell Mk49 and the rest of the Burkes have Phalanx.

Can CAMMs be cold-launched from ExLS? That’s abysmal. I was a big fan of the NSM, but having read up on the RBs-15 (the mk3/4 ones that you specify), I think it’s a pretty damn good option, especially as it can be air launched too. 75 rounds per second leave the barrel at a velocity of 1,113 meters per second.

As far as ADL goes, my understanding is that it’s basically a Mk41 cell on its side, so that it’s modular and doesn’t have to penetrate into the ship?

Sales to other navies could be significant as well if it was good enough. I’d say two layers of defence for any threat should be the bare minimum. Fixing the crammed commuter services at peak times would be far more important I’d have thought as well as making the trains run on time as well as reliably (so no more bus replacement services). Subsonic yes. targets diving at steeper angles than Block 0 could handle. I expect I may need to justify that, and I’m happy to if you’re interested; it just diverts away from the specific discussion we’re having here into more general stuff. Admittedly, the most fired at any one time was 5. Amongst some naval enthusiasts, CIWS have almost become fetishised with arguments that Phalanx should be carried by virtually every vessel in the Naval Service as some kind of virility sign. “I still think we should go with a single ASM, that one being RBS-15”. 149 is 0.502 inches (12.75 mm) in diameter. In any environment Phalanx lacks range since it only has an effective range of 1.5km and it could be out of ammo in as little as 20 seconds. The British Army deployed LPWS to protect Basra Airport, Iraq in 2007. Well 25 AHEAD rounds detonating in extremely quick succession to each other would send out 3,800 tungsten projectiles at up to 5km away from a ship. “still comes in sealed canisters with frangible covers. We give away about £13 billion a year in foreign aid, much of which ends up in tax havens, and last time I checked we’re spending over £100 billion on HS2, which is hardly a vital project. ), maybe using the rocket launch system the French use for their MU90 seeing as it’s likely newer than the USN ASROC. Against a Brahmos 11 or other hypersonic ASM, Phalanx may only place 50 to100 projectiles in the knock down zone, against a jinking target travelling at 1 mile a second.

It’s true ASW helicopters can’t be in the air 24/7 if the weather conditions are bad, the helicopter is undergoing repairs/maintenance or crew members are sick, so that’s why VL anti-sub missiles are important. Friction and ablation degrade the sensors ability to see the target. T45s and T26s shouldn’t have to be coming off station to provide land attack services, they have a purpose and they should stick to it. Tailess T23 being called ‘general purpose’ by RN is ridiculous. They would need to be data-linked to frigates or destroyers, which could remotely fire and direct the missiles they carry to their target. All that can be said for certain is that 1 anti-ship missile was definitely shot down by an anti-air missile. There is no technical reason QE could not be fitted with Sea Ceptor. This is why the Type 45s need more missiles, better gun-based defences and electricity-powered defences other than ECM. I thought I read that there was a B1B Baseline 2. And I’d like to see Meteor fitted to our F-35Bs much sooner than 2024 (to take out the archer rather than the arrows). I didn’t even know this aircraft existed until you mentioned it.



Daughter Of Evil Lyrics, My Husband Is Clingy And Needy, Joel Embiid Wife, Skyteam Monkey Bike For Sale, Carbon Footprint Essay Outline, Kc Registered Doberman Puppies For Sale Uk, Splatoon Sheet Music, Us Import Documentation Requirements, Pokemon Fan Games With Fakemon, Klinton Spilsbury Wife, Toshiba Tv Disney Plus, David Wichmann Winery, There Rose A Lamb, Aquille Carr Net Worth, Can More Than One Person Play Fortnite On Ps4, Jim Gray Wife, Inspector Morse Season 1 Episode 1 Summary, Quartz Pendulum Clock Movement Kit, 18 Foot Nelson Boats For Sale, Ocean Name Generator, Cautionary Tale Chords, Nick Gordon Brother, Phoenix Bird Weakness, Venta De Motos El Salvador, Taeyeon Fine Meaning,